Puget Sound... ya dig?

Puget Sound... ya dig?

Thursday, February 23, 2012

Trancendentalist?

Do I identify myself as a transcendentalist? In some aspects, I see myself as one. The biggest problem with it is that I am not the quickest to agree with ideas or believe them or quickly buy into fads so that would be one major reason that I don’t always agree with the newest and latest fads. I do realize that this would have been in the 19th century. The 19th century was a major turning point in our country’s history, beginning with the new ideas in the earlier part of the decade to the Civil War in the middle, and ending with the Industrial Revolution.

                The parts of transcendentalism that I agree with would be the forward thinking aspects. I really would have been in agreement with abolishing slavery and the rights of women. It is very easy for me to make those decisions, because they should both definitely be considered part of our society today and should have been long before. Look at all of the ideas that African-Americans and women have brought to our country as a result of being instated fully into our society. Those impacts are everlasting and can’t be destroyed. Today we have an African-American president and who did he defeat in the primary, a woman. That would have been unthinkable in that time period to most; however, that is what the transcendentalists had in mind all along.

                The parts that I have trouble agreeing with would be the self-reliance part. Emerson’s Self-Reliance was a very interesting read, but there is no way that I could ever completely agree with all of his thoughts. In life you can’t expect to take on the journey by yourself. A main part of society is companionship and community; those are aspects that are necessary. To live your life by secluding yourself and believing that you have the godly powers that it takes to live on your own without much outside help is absurd. The only place to go from that point of thought is to live a long  lonely life without any help from anybody, and that is something that I cannot completely buy into.

Monday, February 6, 2012

America, "The New Country"

A new map of the United States of America-1854

My initial response to this map was that there was an inclusion of Cuba, a country that America has had an embargo on for the past 50 or so years. I wouldn’t have thought of them in this inclusion of a map no matter the year. Of the 31 states admitted by this time, this map shows all, as well as the 31 states included there are the territories of Oregon, New Mexico, and Utah. Something that is also surprising to me is that there aren’t any specified waterways or bodies of water, which was a good way of transporting goods.

            To me this really signifies the end of an era, it was 70 or so years removed from the Revolutionary war and just a few years before the Civil War will be taking place. The Civil War was the single most destructive act in America’s young history and something that we should learn from. Another thing that I am talking away from this map is the inclusion of Cuba as I mentioned before, it just shows how relations with other countries were not only frequent but important.
http://www.libs.uga.edu/darchive/hargrett/maps/1854w5.jpg